Equus And Amadeus

These texts ch exclusivelyenge the endorser to re-define his/her concept of what it means to be s modeer in our ordering.         The fulfill Equus by scape Schaffer and the optic text Amadeus (the screen play for which was written, incidentally, by the same man), take a crap over m some(prenominal) bases in common. However, the major unifying theme is the contentious view of what is perceived as convening by any social club. I say any fellowship because the play and the learn are muckle in ii shadely assorted time periods. This lets us explore the concept of newton by means of the ages, so to speak.         Equus is a play about a boy named Alan who stabs out the eyeball of several(prenominal) horses due to his move perception of religion and sex. The psychiatrist - Martin Dysart - delves deeper and deeper into Alans mind, attempting to run across out not only WHY Alan committed much(prenominal) a deed, un little also what the boy believes in footing of religion.         Amadeus - a charter about Mozart - explores the feel of the genius and the way he wrote music. It tries to declare reek of how a genius mind full treat handst by introducing Salieri who is set out to find out reasonable how Mozart writes his pieces.         both of these texts set out a psychogenicly unbalance mortala as the protagonist. The degrees of the manpowertal illness are almost bordering on the extreme opposites. That is - Mozart is a socially accepted, popular, humorous, exciting, fun-loving man with a normal libido. Alan, on the new(prenominal) hand, is a sulky, depressed, cynical teenage religious fanatic with a warp perception of sex in relation to horses. So what do they watch in common?         Both the primary(prenominal) characters - Mozart and Alan - lead unmatched obsession in keep. For Mozart it is music, for Alan it is horses. These are just not nor mal obsessions - they are possessed by these! things. practice of medicine takes over Mozarts life, literally killing him. Worshipping horses takes over Alans life, causing him to imposture six-spot horses.         Going on the examples discussed above, it can be give spiel to that passion leads to destruction in some form or another. And men like Mozart and Alan stand out from the rest of the rescript because they have given in to passion and it led to physical consequences.         These texts lead the reader to decide whether it is wrong for a somebody to have such a strong obsession. And is it, above all, a normal and socially acceptable way to live ones life - possessed carry throughly by something which cannot be explained nor accepted by anyone but yourself. is it normal for a person to have complete faith in something, faith which cannot be explained to anyone by informed reasoning?         Equus and Amadeus manage to question the values of the guild .

It is obvious that Alan and Mozart have their priorities and values twisted around - all by their upbringing or a series of incidents. However, it causes the reader toquestion whether the values of the ball club is the norm. And what is the norm? How is it defined? Is the normal that which causes little destruction than the alternative? And what is more important - the individual or the society, when it comes to choosing where the destruction should be channelled? Mozart channelled the destruction fuelled by his obsession on himself. Alan channelled it into the society (that is, the horses belonging to the society), but not on himself. Therefore, which of these men was more a! cceptable? Obviously, Mozart, since he was more socially equilibrise than Alan, who hardly had any friends. However, quite often society promotes selfishness and the star of individuality. So why was it wrong for Alan to stab out the eye of horses if all he wanted to do was, in a sense, protect himself?         Personally, I would have to say that Equus and Amadeus have made me question a lot of things about the society and what is meant by normality. I think that, in the end, beak Schaffer is simply trying to figure out who is normal and who is not. I think his works come back to the age-long paradoxical visual sensation: are the mental hospitals, in reality, full of normal smokestack? If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay